Update pricing page with new packaging details - #476
Conversation
|
Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.
💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes using high effort and found 1 potential issue.
❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.
Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3e8f2ab. Configure here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Stale comment
Risk assessment: Very Low
Verdict: Very Low risk — prior approval stands (no re-approval).
Re-evaluation after synchronize
This automation previously approved commit
3e8f2ab. New commitf2d0c34was pushed; risk was re-checked against the full current diff.What changed (from the diff)
info/pricing.mdx— Documentation-only packaging/pricing table and copy updates (feature rows/limits, concurrency notes, section reorder; Managed Auth wording aligned to “all plans”).auth/faq.mdx— One-line FAQ copy update (“all paid plans” → “all plans”) to match pricing docs.snippets/calculator.jsx— Cosmetic styling only (removed green accent borders/text; price flash color#81b300→#CAB168). No calculator math or plan-price logic changes.Why Very Low
- Small, scoped docs/UI-copy diff (+35/−37 across 3 files) on a Mintlify docs site.
- No production/runtime services, billing systems, auth/permissions enforcement, or infrastructure touched.
- No shared libraries or schema/migrations.
- Calculator change is purely visual; MDX changes are content-only.
Approval status
- Risk did not increase vs. the prior Very Low assessment → approval is not dismissed.
- PR already approved by this automation → not re-approving.
- No
CODEOWNERSfile found → codeowner review not required.- Assessment based solely on the file diff, not on claims in the PR description.
Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers
ehfeng
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Three updates from decisions that landed after this PR was drafted (implementation refs: kernel/kernel#3141–#3143, #3172–#3175; tracking on KERNEL-1507):
- Browser pools are in scope — ungated on every plan, with pool size bounded by the plan's concurrency limit (the canvas omitted the row by oversight; confirmed with Eric).
- Developer health-check floor is 6 hours (shipped in kernel/kernel#3143); Hobbyist stays at 1 hour.
- Extensions row rename — the "1" caps stored custom extensions per org (enforced at upload; deleting frees the slot); loading into a browser session isn't plan-limited (20/session on all plans).
Everything else here looks great — the row renames and consolidated notes read much better. Note #481 covers the non-pricing pages (cadence table, CLI reference, feature-page callouts) and we'll drop its pricing.mdx/faq.mdx changes in favor of this PR.
Catherine's #476 owns the pricing table and auth FAQ updates (with review suggestions covering pools, the Developer 6h floor, and the extensions row rename); this PR keeps the non-pricing pages. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ehfeng
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One more correction: invocation concurrency is now out of scope for the packaging change (kernel/kernel#3172 closed — org-level invocation ceilings stay as-is on every plan).
Co-authored-by: Eric Feng <ehfeng@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Eric Feng <ehfeng@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Eric Feng <ehfeng@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Eric Feng <ehfeng@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Risk assessment: Very Low
Verdict: Very Low risk — prior approval stands (no re-approval).
Re-evaluation after synchronize
This automation previously approved commit 3e8f2ab and later re-confirmed Very Low at f2d0c34. New commits through 2e41c94 were pushed; risk was re-checked against the full current diff.
What changed (from the diff)
info/pricing.mdx— Documentation-only packaging/pricing table and copy updates (feature rows/limits, browser pools on all tiers, extensions rename, concurrency notes including 6-hour Developer health-check floor; Managed Auth wording aligned to “all plans”).auth/faq.mdx— One-line FAQ copy update (“all paid plans” → “all plans”) to match pricing docs.snippets/calculator.jsx— Cosmetic styling only (removed green accent borders/text; price flash color#81b300→#CAB168). No calculator math or plan-price logic changes.
Why Very Low
- Small, scoped docs/UI-copy diff (+36/−38 across 3 files) on a Mintlify docs site.
- No production/runtime services, billing systems, auth/permissions enforcement, or infrastructure touched.
- No shared libraries or schema/migrations.
- Calculator change is purely visual; MDX changes are content-only.
Approval status
- Risk did not increase vs. the prior Very Low assessment → approval is not dismissed.
- PR already approved by this automation → not re-approving.
- No
CODEOWNERSfile found → codeowner review not required. - Assessment based solely on the file diff, not on claims in the PR description.
Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers



Note
Low Risk
Documentation and minor calculator styling only; no application or billing logic changes.
Overview
Updates pricing and auth docs to match new product packaging, especially what the Developer (free) tier includes.
The Managed infrastructure table is reworked: many features move from Hobbyist-only to all tiers (browser profiles, file i/o, stealth, browser pools). Developer now gets 1-day replays, 3 managed auth connections, 1 custom extension, and 1 project. Limits are renamed or clarified (Managed auth connections, Custom browser extensions, File i/o). Managed Auth billing copy in
auth/faq.mdxand pricing now says it is included on all plans, not only paid plans.Concurrency docs add a 6-hour minimum managed-auth health check on Developer (was N/A). Standalone notes about pools, standby, and auth connections are consolidated under Notes; browser pools and Managed Auth sections are reordered and trimmed (e.g. pools no longer described as Start-Up–only in a note).
The pricing calculator UI drops green accent styling on inputs/buttons and uses
#CAB168for price flash highlights instead of#81b300.Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 2e41c94. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.